Public Management
Leila Ghasemi esfahlan; Akbar Nassanpoor; SAEED JAFARINIA; Bijan Abdollahi
Abstract
Today, dissent occurs easily in modern organizations, as a result, organizations where there is dissent are healthier. The purpose of this research is to present a model for managing organizational dissent in public universities of East Azerbaijan province. The present research method is qualitative ...
Read More
Today, dissent occurs easily in modern organizations, as a result, organizations where there is dissent are healthier. The purpose of this research is to present a model for managing organizational dissent in public universities of East Azerbaijan province. The present research method is qualitative and based on the basic theory of Corbin and Strauss. The data collection tool is a semi-structured interview. The statistical population of the present study included 17 university professors and journalists who were selected by purposeful snowball sampling. Based on the findings of the present research, the central phenomenon in two main constructive dimensions with codes such as: disagreement, questioning policies or organizational practices in a principled way, spirit of helping, correction and rationality of the opinions presented. and...; In the non-constructive dimension with codes like: disagreement, questioning policies or organizational practices in an irrational way, providing negative and biased feedback, etc. Causal conditions affecting organizational dissent are divided into three categories: individual, managerial, and organizational-communicative factors. The identified intervening factors are divided into two general categories: intra-organizational attitudinal pressures, extra-organizational pressures. Identified background factors are: psychological and knowledge conditions, demographic background, religious background, communication/organizational conditions, managers' behavioral and attitudinal patterns, and the prevailing organizational culture and atmosphere. The consequences identified in this research are: individual and group, organizational and extra-organizational consequences.
Leila Ghasemi esfahlan; Akbar Hassanpoor; Saeed Jafarinia; Bijan Abdollahi
Abstract
One of the characteristics that show the dynamism of today's organizations is the benefit of organizations from the constructive and useful point of view of employees in increasing the quality of decisions making in organizations. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting ...
Read More
One of the characteristics that show the dynamism of today's organizations is the benefit of organizations from the constructive and useful point of view of employees in increasing the quality of decisions making in organizations. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the factors affecting the expression of organizational dissent of employees in the university. The method of this research is qualitative and exploratory which has been done using content analysis and documental study. The statistical sample of this research included 120 articles published in the valid journals searched in domestic and foreign scientific databases by searching for keywords and performing the screening process. Finally, 30 works were selected for further review and analysis. The result of the literature review and analysis was the extraction of 31 basic themes, 13 constructive themes, and 4 comprehensive themes. Findings showed that the factors affecting the willingness of employees to express organizational opposition are 4 main dimensions: personal, communicational, organizational, and environmental, each of which can affect the willingness of employees to express organizational dissent, but the decision to choose the approach of expressing depends on which particular issue and factor will be affected in that particular situation at the time of selection; therefore, depending on the circumstances, it is necessary to identify the considerations of each factor and consider the correct approach to express organizational dissent of employees.
